Table 1. Group Plan
No.
|
Assignment
|
Due Date
|
Comment Due Date
|
Names
|
Your roles
(Be specific)
|
1
|
Program Design
|
3. 5
|
3.19
|
Member 1: TM (3) Rational Practical Cases
(Group leader)
Member 2: DC (4) Program
Member 3: TR (2)
Rationale L. R.
Member 4: RS (1) Intro
The whole group: (5)
Review and Edit final draft
|
|
2
|
Program Evaluation
|
4.2
|
4.9
|
Member 1: TM (3) Unify Student Responses
Member 2: DC (4)Unify
Group Responses
Member 3: TR Task Master
(Group leader)
Member 4: RS (2) Professional Evaluations
The whole group: Review and
Edit final draft
|
|
3
|
Demonstration
|
4. 16
|
4.23
|
Member 1: TM (1) Video 1
Member 2: DC (3) Demo
Member 3: TR (3) Demo
Member 4: RS (2) Video 2
(Group leader)
The whole group: Review and
Edit final draft
|
Itinerary
Note Taker: DC
Group meeting was held over VOIP interface via gotomeeting. Other VOIP platforms that have trial or are free: Skype, Ventrillo, Teamspeak, and Discord
Transmission of documents will be via emailed word documents
Blogger
Dashboard is listed on the leftt hand side of the screen. Our Group Plan is currently a page. To edit a page, click on the Page link on the dashboard, then click on the edit link just under the title of the page. This format is consistent for similar areas of the blog such as the Posts when editing. Currently, there is a page set up for each of our literature reviews.To make your Page visible you must click on the publish tab. Return to the Dashboard and click on Layout tab. Once there click on the edit link on the lower right hand side of the Pages block. A menu will pop up, so make certain popups are allowed, select the document and then click save. Check to blog view to see if posted. If you run into issues do not be afraid to use the forums or email me; drshad@bsu.edu.
Group Plan
Group members have been claimed: member 1 = TM Tashina Manuel
member 2 = DC DeArtha Chambers
member 3 = TR Terry Rood
member 4 = RS Raeanna Schlotterbeck
Literature Review
DC suggested exchanging rough drafts for peer review: 24 hour turnaround, suggested date 2/8/2017, 7 p.m. Group members confirmed exchange; DC and TM will exchange for edit and TR and RS will exchange for edit
Program Design -
(1) Introduction (Purpose and Objectives)- brief background, objectives, foundations of program rationale- RS
(2) Rationale from Literature- a review and summary of the individual group members literature reviews-TM
(3) Rational from Practical Cases - A review of existing programs on our topic; where program located, how designed, take-away, incorporation, etc.- TR
(4) Program- One person write up; Whole group contributes-DC
(5) Highlights and Major Components of Our design- lessons/tips learned from the assignment, how was it completed, other advice (time mgt, skills, group negotiation, etc)-TM, DC, TR, & RS
Due in a sequential form
2/19 - parts 2, 3, complete - RS & TM
2/26- part 4 write up due to group - DC
3/2 - part 1, 5 due; group edit
3/5 - final draft submission 7p.m. EST
Program Evaluation
Each group member will find an evaluator if possible for the program providing us a minimum of 2 reviewers and a maximum of 4.
Here we need one person per section to unify our voices and then one person to unify into one document.
(2) Professional evaluations: the written evaluation; what they liked and what we need to improve-RS
(3) Unifying Our Student responses- do we agree or not and why, our improvements; include specific examples-TM
(4) Group Reflection-highlights of uniqueness, how complete, processes, advice/learned- DC
Due in sequential form
3/19 Review from Outside Evaluator - TM, DC, TR, & RS
3/25 Individual Student Response and Group Reflection due - TM, DC, TR, & RS
3/30 Whole Assignment for review- DC
4/2 Final Draft 7 p.m. EST
Demonstration
(1) Video 1 TM
(2) Video 2 RS
(3) Demo TR & DC
Due
4/12 all work due to group
4/16 final draft 11:59 EST
WoW, absolutely love your group plan!! This is the most informative group plan I have ever seen! LOL!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete