Literature
Review
Tashina
Manuel
Ball
State University
LITERATURE
REVIEW
Name
|
Commented on…
|
Tashina Manuel
|
DeArtha Chambers
Raeanne Schlotterbeck Terry Rood
Nichole Mann
Michael Szajewski
|
Introduction
Adult education has in recent years, have begun to
include self-directed learning as a major area of research in adult
learning. In early research on self-directed
learning, the focus was on verifying that adults do indeed learn on their own,
as well as focusing on the ways adults go about learning on their own (Merriam,
Caffarella & Baumgartner, 2007, p.106).
Research on self-directed learning has now come a long way in a short
time. There is now literature on more
in-depth models, as well as growing debate on what the goals of self-directed
learning should be (Merriam, Caffarella & Baumgartner, 2007, p. 105-106).
General
Themes
One major theme regarding self-directed learning, is it’s
inclusion in technology, as well as how technology can and does play a major
role in self-directed learning. Due to a
technology driven learning environment, self directed learning is more relevant
in education now, more than ever. According
to Bryan (2015), “In today’s technology enhanced learning environment, the
teachers, the mentors, and even the friends may be continents away from the
learner” (p. 42). Collaboration in the
digital world can intuitively seem to decrease the benefits of self-direction;
however, electronic collaboration actually heightens the need for learners to
be self-directed (Bryan, p. 43). When
learning through collaboration with others, there needs to be a self-directed
learning component among the skills of each individual. This self-directed learning component is
needed, so that a student will be able to contribute his or her experiences and
actively learn from others in a technology-driven learning environment. The technology factor in self-directed
learning, not only refers to a technology-driven learning environment. It also can refer to any learning
environment. In most learning environments,
technology plays a major role, because of our society being loaded with
information. Several studies have proven
that self-directed learning is a major factor for predicting learners’ academic
success in non-Web-based distance learning. The inclusion of technology in a
curriculum in some way, is enough to help develop skills for self-directed
learning. Therefore, regardless of
whether technology is being used to foster new learning in a closed classroom
or via a Web-based platform, self-directed learning can improve the capacity of
the learner (Bryan, p. 44).
A second major theme in self-directed learning, is that
this type of learning is a tool that can promote lifelong learning. One active learning technique that is showing
great promise in the preparation of students for life after college and well
into their careers, is self-directed learning (Boyer, Edmondson, Artis &
Fleming, 2014, p. 20). A major focus of
college learning, is the preparation to be better employees in the
workplace. College students who are
taught how to be proactive and self-directed learners will be more prepared as
employees to anticipate their company’s needs, adapt their learning to meet
their own learning styles, and obtain the necessary skills, knowledge, and capabilities
to create value for their clients, employers, and organizations (Boyer,
Edmondson, Artis & Fleming, p. 20). A
higher level of motivation is a catalyst for greater self-directed learning
readiness (Boyer, Edmondson, Artis & Fleming, p. 22). Normally, a learner wants to gather, learn
and apply information for the betterment of his or her life and career. If the learner sees a possible positive
outcome from engaging in self-directed learning, believes that a desired
outcome is highly probable, and believes that this investment of effort in
self-directed learning will achieve the goal, then the learner will willingly
engage in self-directed learning (Boyer, Edmondson, Artis & Fleming, p.
22). In a study of several self-directed learning
projects among graduate students, many of these students reported gaining
skills and growing their businesses as a result of the project. Many students reported advancing their
careers and became better leaders in their careers. The self-directed learning project motivated
these students (Boyer, Edmondson, Artis & Fleming, p. 28). Motivation is a main ingredient in
self-directed learning. The student has
to have a larger purpose behind engaging in self-directed learning, in order
for him or her to be motivated to engage in it and carry out the complete
process.
A third major theme in self-directed learning is the need
for a practitioner to develop an actual design of a self-directed learning
space. According to Pata, (2009), “…common
learning spaces for self-directed learners may be characterized, shaped and
utilized at the targeted university courses as part of an ecological learning
design framework” (p. 23). A learner’s
self-directing competencies should be priority, when developing new graduate
level courses. Based on a learner’s own
personal and work objectives, self-directed learning frameworks should be
adapted to these objectives by the learner.
With the help of teachers, there are several steps in an ecological
learning design framework for supporting self-directed learning in the new
social Web. According to Pata, (2009),
these steps include the following:
1.
Define the learning and teaching niches for your students by collecting their
affordance perceptions of their learning spaces dynamically in the course of
action.
2. To
support the conscious self-managed development of learner-determined spaces,
provide students with the tools of visualizing and monitoring their
activity-patterns and learning landscapes, and enhancing public self-reflection
and collaborative grounding of learning affordances.
3. To
maintain coherence of the current niche, introduce cycles of re-evaluation of
learning affordances of the learning space within your course.
4. Try to influence the niche re-emergence by
embedding activity traces and ecological knowledge relevant to evoke
affordances for certain niches or select activity systems where these traces
are naturally present.
5. Use
same social learning environments repeatedly to gain from feedback left as
activity traces and embodied knowledge of earlier learners. (p. 28)
Learners’ actions and their
perception of their learning environment should always be considered when
developing a learning design framework.
The steps above demonstrate how to do this, as learning design
frameworks constantly evolve.
A fourth major theme, is that self-directed learning has
been shown to outperform more traditional forms of learning. In a study of a German medical curriculum, it
was found that direct instruction was outperformed by self-directed learning
(Peine, Kabino & Spreckelsen, 2016, p. 158). This helps to put a purpose behind
researching the previous themes listed.
Self-directed learning is constantly being proven as a preferred method
of learning. The study included 244
medical students who were tested on the comparison of their direct instruction
learning compared to later self-directed learning. All students showed notable improvements
through post-testing scores after learning through a more self-directed
learning curriculum. The self-directed
learning curriculum included e-learning and self-study. The study showed that students in modern
study programs learn better through self-instructed methods than through
conventional direct instruction methods. It was concluded that these self-study
methods should be used more often. Not
only did these self-study methods show improved learning, they also showed
better levels of student acceptance and higher scores in personal
self-assessment of knowledge (Peine, Kabino &
Spreckelsen, 2016, p. 158).
Implications
Practitioners in education can apply the general themes
of self-directed learning directly in
their practice, by studying the needs of their students, using technology to
engage their students, and communicating an obvious connection of the positive
outcome of their students’ self-directed learning to their own short-term and
long-term professional goals. Motivation
in self-directed learning was described in one of the themes of self-directed
learning. Students can utilize
self-directed learning more willingly and effectively, when they have the
motivation to do so. While a portion of
this motivation needs to come from the student, the teacher can also play a
role in helping students to identify this motivation. The teacher can do this by asking the student
to really think about his or her goals, and how and why they want to apply what
they are learning to their professional life.
Once a student can identify why they are doing something, they will have
more of a drive to engage in self-directed learning.
The
teacher can also apply the themes to practice by using technology. The current society we live in, is very
technology-driven. This gives teachers
and students the opportunity to have access to more information in record
speed. This has called for a need for
self-directed learning, as well as helped create an environment for
self-directed learning. Teachers can now
require more hands-on research from their students, which requires and helps to
develop skills in self-directed learning.
Practitioners can also take this a step further and ask their students
to apply their research to their own lives and discuss how they can use what
they have learned to apply in the future.
Practitioners can utilize the availability of technology, that all
students now have at their fingertips, to help engage them in self-directed
learning. They can use self-study and
e-learning programs to help foster self-directed learning.
Last,
but not least, practitioners can also study their past and current students to
help understand what their students need in their self-directed learning
journey. This will help the practitioner
constantly keep up with changes and adjustments that need to be made to their
class curriculum in order to foster the best self-directed learning environment
possible. The learning landscape is
impossible to effectively develop, without the student’s input. This is what helps self-directed learning to
thrive. Practitioners can use
questionnaires to gather feedback from earlier students, in order to directly
apply some of this feedback to the next time they offer the course. They can also gather feedback from using the
same social learning environments in each of their courses. Practitioners should make it a priority to
allow for student interactions through group projects and discussion
boards. This will allow for pertinent
information regarding how effective the self-directed learning environment is,
and what needs to be done to make it more effective. This is all so important, because not only will
this help students academically, but they can use this skill to positively
affect their future careers.
Reflection
One highlight to the above analysis, is that
self-directed learning is not 100% in the hands of the student. Although the student plays a large role in
his or her self-directed learning, the teacher also has a major role in the
student’s self-directed learning journey.
The student cannot proceed without some direction from the
practitioner. The practitioner gains the
ability to give direction through research of what techniques he or she
believes will work best for the students.
Once the practitioner sets in place a curriculum framework, the course
can then be self-directed by the student, within the framework. Another highlight, is that with the growing
use of technology in the learning environment, some use of self-directed
learning is a necessity. Students have
to educate themselves on technology, in order to use it effectively in the
classroom.
In completing this assignment, I researched and read
several articles on the topic of self-directed learning. I narrowed the articles down to the ones that
were most interesting to me, and the ones that I believe presented useful
information for practitioners who want to learn more about self-directed
learning. I have learned that there is a
plethora of information available about self-directed, but that I had to
approach the challenge of narrowing it down to what has been presented in this
assignment. Self-directed learning is a
growing subject in adult education, and will continue to prove useful for
learners.
Summary
References
Boyer, S.L., Edmondson, D.R.,
Artis, A.B. & Fleming, D. (2014). Self-Directed Learning:
A Tool
for Lifelong Learning. Journal of
Marketing Education, 36(1), 20-32.
BRYAN, V. C. (2015).
Self-Directed Learning and Technology. Education Digest, 80(6),
42-44.
Merriam, S.B., Caffarella,
R.S., & Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in Adulthood: A
Comprehensive Guide. San
Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Pata, K. (2009). Modeling
spaces for self-directed learning at university courses.
Journal Of Educational Technology &
Society, 12(3), 23-43.
Peine, A., Kabino, K. &
Spreckelsen, C. (2016). Self-directed learning can outperform
direct
instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results
of a
mixed methods trial. BMC Medical
Education, 16(1), 158.
Hi Tashina,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your review! I think this will be helpful when working on our project, especially when trying to incorporate technology appropriately. Thank you for your work!
Tashina,
ReplyDeleteIt looks like we managed to hit on some of the same themes while also going in different directions on others. I think the use of technology is going to be huge consideration in the design of our program. I also found it really interesting that SDL outpaces traditional instruction in terms of results. I wonder how much of that has to do with the intrinsic drive needed to undertake SDL vs. sitting in a class and listening to a lecture.
Tashina,
ReplyDeleteI really liked your review. It is true that technology plays a large role in self-directed learning and has enhanced the speed and direction of learning - so much information at our fingertips! Another point you made that really hit home for me was how self-directed learners are better prepared for the workplace. Adapting to a company's needs, learning new skills or gaining new knowledge to stay productive and capable in a position is a fact of life for most workers in today's market. Often, a learner must do these things on their own - not wait for the company to provide training or guidance.
Great job!
Tashina
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your literature review. I highlighted this key point from your paper about motivation:
"The teacher can do this by asking the student to really think about his or her goals, and how and why they want to apply what they are learning to their professional life. Once a student can identify why they are doing something, they will have more of a drive to engage in self-directed learning."
Sometimes students forget why they are learning. Often times it is due to distractions, unforeseen occurances, or boredom. Students can also lose their focus on their personal or professional goals.
If the learner can be reminded of how, what, when, where, and why of learning, they can again focus on the task(s) at hand. Knowles stated that motivation is not innate; rather it is conditioned (Tennant, 1988).
A practitioner can look for ways to condition learning, as an athletic coach would condition his or her athletes in preparation for a game. In time, with readiness and maturity, the learner can self direct their learning process.
Great article! Has good implications in the workplace and classroom setting.
Carlos
Reference
Tennant, M. (1988, 1996) Psychology and Adult Learning, London: Routledge.
Hi Tashina! I thought your discussion of technology in self directed learning was great, and hit on an important point in higher ed today. A lot of students, even "tech-y millennials" don't feel comfortable using new technology. Programs like Zoom and Prezi, designed to improve on existing technologies, may be unfamiliar to them. It can be a real challenge to meet students where they are when it comes to technology. Easy to access walkthroughs and on-campus technical support have been some strategies I've seen help with this issue. I also made a point to incorporate technologies that students may not have used before when I was teaching new student seminar. Because it was a small part of the course with guidance available, students were able to practice the technology, with the hope that when it became useful later, they wouldn't be so afraid to engage with it.
ReplyDeleteTashina,
ReplyDeleteThis is a well written paper! You followed the instructions quite well! The structure of the paper is clear, and each part connects to each other quite logically.
Suggestions:
1. Move the contents in the right side of the table to the left side of the table. In Application, tell us specific strategies about how to support SDL based on the content at the left side of the table.
2. Check APA format. For example:
In a study of a German medical curriculum, it was found that direct instruction was outperformed by self-directed learning (Peine, Kabino & Spreckelsen, 2016, p. 158).
----Check APA about indirect citation. You don’t need page number.
BRYAN, V. C. (2015). Self-Directed Learning and Technology. Education Digest, 80(6),
42-44.
----- Check APA about journal articles. Italicize 80. You only need to capitalize the the first letter in self.
Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.S., & Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in Adulthood: A
Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
----- Check APA about book. You only need to capitalize L and A in the title of the book.
Bo